India's Diplomatic Approach to the Board of Peace
India has chosen a cautious approach regarding US President Donald Trump's Board of Peace, unveiled at a ceremony in Davos. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has neither declined nor accepted the invitation to join, preferring to evaluate the situation first.
Reasons for India's Caution
- Legitimacy and Longevity Concerns
- India is assessing the legitimacy of the board, noting the absence of major European countries like France, Germany, and the UK.
- Permanent UN Security Council members Russia, China, France, and the UK have not joined, questioning the board's legitimacy.
- The board’s longevity is uncertain, as it is seen as a passion project of President Trump, which may lose significance once he leaves office.
- Multilateralism and the UN Framework
- India values its commitment to multilateralism and the UN framework, wary of the board undermining these principles.
- The decision-making process of the board is unclear, whether it will be consultative or dominated by Trump's preferences.
- Potential Involvement in Conflicts
- Concerns about the board extending its mandate beyond Gaza to other conflicts, given Trump's history of involvement.
- India supports a focused approach, as suggested by Canada's Prime Minister, limiting the board's operations to Gaza.
Strategic and Diplomatic Considerations
- Balancing long-standing foreign policy principles against the strategic benefits of joining a global platform.
- Potential diplomatic fallout with the US if India declines to participate.
- Pakistan's inclusion in the board adds pressure on India, as it could affect decision-making in future conflicts.
In conclusion, India is carefully evaluating its position on the Board of Peace, considering various diplomatic, strategic, and international factors before making a decision.
