Supreme Court (SC) Directs Timely Filling of Vacancies in Central and State Information Commissions | Current Affairs | Vision IAS
MENU
Home

Periodically curated articles and updates on national and international developments relevant for UPSC Civil Services Examination.

Quick Links

High-quality MCQs and Mains Answer Writing to sharpen skills and reinforce learning every day.

Watch explainer and thematic concept-building videos under initiatives like Deep Dive, Master Classes, etc., on important UPSC topics.

ESC

The directive of SC follows the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that highlighted the lack of progress in filling vacancies despite the Court's 2019 judgment in Anjali Bhardwaj v. Union of India.

SC’s Key Observations & Directions

  • Central Information Commission (CIC): The CIC has a Chief Information Commissioner and 2 Information Commissioners (ICs). There are 10 sanctioned posts for ICs.
  • States: Most states have initiated selection processes of State Information Commissions (SICs) but lack clear timelines for appointments.
  • Highlighted the need for diversity in appointments: As the 2019 judgment mandated selecting ICs from various walks of life, not just bureaucrats.
  • Supreme Court Directives: ToDepartment of Personnel and Training & States that they should provide a detailed timelines for selection completion and appointment notifications of Information Commissioners.

Concerns due to Defunct Information Commissions

  • Vacancies in ICs lead to increased pendency: E.g., West Bengal IC would take 24 years to dispose of a complaint filed in 2022.
  • Proactive Disclosure Gaps: A significant portion (44%) of RTIs is filed for information that should be proactively disclosed under Section 4 of the RTI Act, but such disclosures have declined over the years.
  • Defunct Commissions: Several ICs, such as those in Tripura and Jharkhand, are defunct and do not contribute to addressing the backlog.

Important Supreme Court judgments related to RTI

  • Peoples Union for Civil Rights vs. Union of India (2004): Recognized the right to information as a fundamental right under the Constitution, laying the foundation for the RTI Act.
  • Subhash Chandra Agarwal vs. Dept. of Personnel (2010): Clarified that the Office of the Chief Justice of India (CJI) falls under the RTI Act
  • Namit Sharma v. Union of India (2013): The IC is a tribunal with quasi-judicial functions, similar to a court.
Watch Video News Today

Explore Related Content

Discover more articles, videos, and terms related to this topic

RELATED VIDEOS

2
News Today (Jan 08, 2025)

News Today (Jan 08, 2025)

YouTube HD
Lateral Entry

Lateral Entry

YouTube HD
Title is required. Maximum 500 characters.

Search Notes

Filter Notes

Loading your notes...
Searching your notes...
Loading more notes...
You've reached the end of your notes

No notes yet

Create your first note to get started.

No notes found

Try adjusting your search criteria or clear the search.

Saving...
Saved

Please select a subject.

Referenced Articles

linked

No references added yet