Supreme Court (SC) Issues Directions to Curb Tanneries' Pollution in Palar River | Current Affairs | Vision IAS
MENU
Home

Periodically curated articles and updates on national and international developments relevant for UPSC Civil Services Examination.

Quick Links

High-quality MCQs and Mains Answer Writing to sharpen skills and reinforce learning every day.

Watch explainer and thematic concept-building videos under initiatives like Deep Dive, Master Classes, etc., on important UPSC topics.

ESC

These directions were issued in accordance with a judgment passed in Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs. Union of India (1996). 

  • In this judgement, the SC observed that "Precautionary Principle" and "Polluter Pays Principle" are essential features of "Sustainable Development."
    • Polluter pays’ principle is a practice where those who produce pollution should bear the costs of managing it to prevent damage to human health or the environment.
    • Precautionary principle enables decision-makers to adopt precautionary measures when evidence of environmental or human health hazard is uncertain.

Key Highlights of SC Directions 

  • The State Government to pay compensation to affected individuals which is to be recovered from the polluters as per ‘polluter pays’ principle.
  • The SC asked State to constitute an expert committee to assess and audit the ecological damage and suggest remedial measures.

Palar River Pollution due to Tanneries            

  • The Palar River in Tamil Nadu is heavily polluted by tanneries which discharge untreated chemical effluents, including toxic heavy metals like chromium.
  • Tanneries are factories where animal hides are processed and transformed into leather
  • The untreated discharge from tanneries causes irreversible damage to the water bodies, groundwater and agricultural lands etc.

SC Judgements Regarding Constitutionalization of Environmental Issues

  • Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra vs. State (1988): Recognized the right to live in a healthy environment as part of Article 21 of the Constitution.
  • M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India (1987): Acknowledged the right to live in pollution free environment as a part of fundamental right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution.
  • T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs Union Of India & Ors (1996): Expanded 'forest' meaning to preserve green expanses, irrespective of their nature, classification or ownership.
Watch Video News Today

Explore Related Content

Discover more articles, videos, and terms related to this topic

RELATED VIDEOS

3
News Today (Jan 31, 2025)

News Today (Jan 31, 2025)

YouTube HD
What is Artificial Rain? | Deep Dive With VisionIAS

What is Artificial Rain? | Deep Dive With VisionIAS

YouTube HD
Carbon Markets

Carbon Markets

YouTube HD
Title is required. Maximum 500 characters.

Search Notes

Filter Notes

Loading your notes...
Searching your notes...
Loading more notes...
You've reached the end of your notes

No notes yet

Create your first note to get started.

No notes found

Try adjusting your search criteria or clear the search.

Saving...
Saved

Please select a subject.

Referenced Articles

linked

No references added yet