UPSC Daily News Summary | Current Affairs | Vision IAS

Daily News Summary

Get concise and efficient summaries of key articles from prominent newspapers. Our daily news digest ensures quick reading and easy understanding, helping you stay informed about important events and developments without spending hours going through full articles. Perfect for focused and timely updates.

News Summary

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
India-Taliban talks: Delhi must not give up core values, should underline concerns
  • The Indian Express
  • |
  • International Relations
  • |
  • 2025-01-10
  • Bilateral Relations
  • Taliban
  • India-Afghanistan

India's evolving engagement with the Taliban highlights its enduring strategic ties with Afghanistan, amidst geopolitical realities involving Pakistan. Despite concerns over the Taliban's domestic policies, India seeks to balance humanitarian support with core values, fostering regional stability.

India's Strategic Relations with Afghanistan

India's relationship with Afghanistan maintains a strategic character, marked by recent high-level engagements such as the meeting between Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri and Afghanistan's acting Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi in Dubai. Despite the Taliban's return to power in August 2021, which was initially seen as a setback for India, the ties have been strengthening.

India's Engagement with the Taliban

  • The Taliban's return was viewed as a gain for Pakistan, yet the group has shown eagerness to improve relations with India.
  • India has cautiously elevated its interactions with the Taliban, now extending to the level of foreign secretary.
  • India is responding to Kabul's requests for humanitarian assistance and developmental cooperation, highlighting an enduring geopolitical reality.

Historical and Geopolitical Context

  • There is a historical warmth between India and Afghanistan, unaffected by changes in the regime.
  • Factors contributing to this warmth include the absence of bilateral disputes and shared cross-border issues with Pakistan.
  • Afghanistan has often looked to India to counterbalance pressures from Pakistan, given the latter's interference in Afghan affairs.

Challenges for India

  • Domestic Orientation of the Taliban:
    • The regime's repression and denial of basic rights to women are significant concerns for India.
    • While India lacks the power to change Afghanistan’s internal politics, it aims to encourage political and social moderation.
  • Abandonment of Previous Allies:
    • India's refusal to grant visas to Afghans who supported it over decades marks a problematic shift.
    • While forming new alliances in Kabul is strategic, neglecting long-term partners is unwise.

Strategic Partnerships

The location of the meeting, Dubai, signifies India's potential cooperation with the UAE and other moderate Arab states to foster positive changes in Afghanistan.

India-Taliban talks — realism in Acting West
  • The Indian Express
  • |
  • International Relations
  • |
  • 2025-01-10
  • Chabahar Port
  • India-Afghanistan
  • Act west policy

Amid geopolitical tensions, India continues to communicate with the Taliban, providing humanitarian aid to Afghanistan, while exploring regional cooperation opportunities, despite not formally recognizing the Taliban regime.

India's Engagement with the Taliban

Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri's meeting with the Taliban's acting foreign minister, Amir Khan Muttaqi, in Dubai marks a significant elevation in dialogue between India and the Taliban regime in Kabul. Despite not formally recognizing the Taliban, India has maintained functional channels of communication since the regime's rise in August 2021.

Geopolitical Context

  • India condemned Pakistani airstrikes in Afghanistan, which resulted in civilian casualties, and opposed Pakistan's rationale of targeting Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) camps.
  • The Taliban's refusal to acknowledge the Durand Line, a colonial demarcation, and support for TTP's pan-Pashtun ambitions challenge Pakistan's strategic depth aspirations.
  • Pakistan faces threats from an estimated 6,000-6,500 TTP fighters supported by the Taliban, highlighting Pakistan's own historical support for such groups.

Regional and International Dynamics

  • Links between the Taliban, TTP, and al-Qaeda remain strong, as they collaborate against the Islamic State Khorasan Province.
  • Syria's situation with Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) raises questions about possible rehabilitation of the Taliban regime.
  • International players like China, Russia, and Pakistan have engaged with Taliban 2.0, while India continues cautious engagement.

India's Strategic Opportunities

  • India has reinstated a presence in Kabul by dispatching a technical team in 2022, after initially recalling all personnel.
  • The Taliban seeks international recognition, which the UN Credentials Committee has consistently denied.
  • India can leverage its expertise in cricket to engage Afghan youth and strengthen bilateral relations.

Humanitarian Assistance and Cooperation

  • Post the Misri-Muttaqi meeting, India pledged material support for Afghanistan's health sector and refugee rehabilitation.
  • India has provided essential medicines, vaccines, and other supplies, allocating Rs 200 crore for Afghanistan in the 2024-25 budget.
  • India's collaboration with Iran via Chabahar Port could enhance support for Afghan refugees and address humanitarian needs.

Conclusion

India's engagement with the Taliban, amidst a complex geopolitical landscape, reflects a pragmatic approach to securing regional interests and humanitarian obligations. Strengthening ties with Afghanistan can further India's "Act West" policy, recognizing the Taliban's enduring presence.

Why MSP should not be legalised
  • The Indian Express
  • |
  • Economics (Indian Economy)
  • |
  • 2025-01-10
  • MSP
  • Producer Support Estimates
  • AMUL model

The article critiques the legal enforcement of Minimum Support Prices (MSPs) for farmers in India, arguing it would disrupt the market economy. It suggests promoting freer markets and creating value chains, citing growth in non-MSP agriculture sectors.

Analysis of Legalizing Minimum Support Prices (MSPs) in Agriculture

The text outlines the complexities and potential drawbacks of legalizing Minimum Support Prices (MSPs) for agricultural produce, highlighting the importance of understanding market economies and the potential consequences of government intervention.

Market Dynamics and MSPs

  • The price of agricultural products in a market economy is determined by demand and supply.
  • If MSPs become legally binding, it could lead to situations where supply exceeds demand.
  • Excess supply responsibility would fall on the government, raising questions about its capacity to purchase surplus produce.

Issues with Price Deficiency Payments

  • Legalizing MSPs would eliminate market prices below MSP, making the government the de facto buyer of all MSP-declared commodities.
  • Price deficiency payments could encourage traders to manipulate market prices, creating financial strain on the government.
  • The example of Madhya Pradesh showed the difficulties in implementing price deficiency mechanisms.

Current MSP Implementation

  • The current MSP policy stems from historical grain deficits and is effectively implemented only for rice and wheat in a few states.
  • Only about 10% of farmers benefit from selling at MSP, questioning its efficacy.

Performance of Non-MSP Commodities

  • Commodities without MSP, like fisheries and horticulture, have shown significant growth rates, outperforming MSP-covered staples such as wheat and rice.
  • This suggests market-based systems can be more effective.

Distortions and Biases in Agri-Price Policy

  • Government interventions often distort markets, leading to an anti-farmer bias in agri-price policies.
  • India uniquely has negative Producer Support Estimates (PSEs) among G20 countries, indicating implicit taxation on agriculture.

Recommendations

  • Advocates for freer markets and building agri-value chains, akin to the AMUL model, where farmers retain a significant portion of consumer prices.
  • Opposes making MSPs legal, suggesting it would counteract economic liberalization efforts.

The text concludes with a personal perspective from the author, emphasizing the need for rational policymaking that supports farmers without undermining market mechanisms.

Why farmers deserve price security
  • The Indian Express
  • |
  • Economics (Indian Economy)
  • |
  • 2025-01-10
  • Crop Diversification
  • MSP
  • price deficiency payments

The article discusses the necessity of implementing a Minimum Support Price (MSP). It suggests a Price Deficiency Payments (PDP) system to ensure financial security and promote crop diversification.

Minimum Support Price (MSP) Guarantee for Farmers

There is an ongoing debate about whether there should be a legal or otherwise minimum support price (MSP) guarantee for crops produced by farmers. This issue is expected to become less relevant over the next two decades due to the changing dynamics in agriculture.

Current Agricultural Challenges

  • Agriculture is witnessing a significant diversion of fertile lands for real estate development and infrastructure projects, reducing land available for farming.
  • The official number of operational farms is high, but the number of households earning more than half their income from farming might be as low as 40 million, and declining.
  • The challenge is not just feeding a growing population but also retaining agricultural lands and talent.

Factors Influencing Agricultural Growth

  • Past agricultural growth was driven by improved trade terms and new technologies such as hybrid seeds and genetically modified crops.
  • The last decade has seen a decline in the terms of trade index and a slowdown in agricultural innovations.

Need for Price Assurance

  • Assurance of price is crucial for farmers to invest in land and technologies to improve yields and reduce costs.
  • Agriculture is unique with high production and price risks, which are exacerbated by climate change.
  • Price risk is a critical area that needs to be addressed to ensure farmers continue farming.

Implementing a price deficiency payments (PDP) System

  • The proposed PDP system would pay farmers the price difference when crops are sold below the government-declared MSP.
  • This system would promote formalization and digitization of the farm produce trade, leading to more recorded transactions.
  • Farmers would begin demanding receipts from buyers, detailing the quantity and price of their sold crops.
  • States would be incentivized to set up APMC mandis or electronic trading platforms to facilitate the recording of transactions.
  • The Centre's payment of price differences would be contingent on states generating necessary sales data.

Encouraging Crop Diversification

  • Without basic price assurance, expecting farmers to diversify crops is unrealistic.
  • There is a need for policies to encourage farmers to grow a variety of crops rather than sticking to traditional ones like paddy or sugarcane.

The article emphasizes the strategic importance of providing a legal MSP and its role in securing the future of Indian agriculture by ensuring farmers' livelihoods and encouraging agricultural sustainability.

The lack of empathy for survivors of sexual violence, assault
  • The Indian Express
  • |
  • Indian Society
  • |
  • 2025-01-10
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)
  • Section 397
  • Right to Health

The Delhi High Court mandates hospitals to provide free medical treatment to victims of rape, child sexual abuse, and acid attacks, emphasizing their statutory right to therapeutic access. The court highlights systemic issues and calls for reforms, including providing clothing to victims.

Provision of Free Medical Treatment for Survivors of Sexual Violence

The Delhi High Court has mandated that all hospitals, regardless of their governing body, must provide free medical treatment to survivors of rape, child sexual abuse, and acid attacks. This directive is rooted in the legal framework established by Section 397, BNSS, and Section 357C, CrPC, which obligates medical facilities to offer comprehensive first-aid and treatment at no cost.

Guidelines and Legal Framework

  • All public and private hospitals must adhere to the mandate for free treatment.
  • The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Guidelines (2014) extend this requirement to cover services such as OPD registration, pathology tests, and medicines.
  • The court has instructed hospitals to educate their staff on the legal obligations and put up visible signs to ensure compliance.
  • Denying free treatment is a criminal offense, punishable by up to one year of imprisonment or fines.

Therapeutic Jurisprudence

This legal order advances the concept of "therapeutic jurisprudence" by emphasizing the importance of accessible medical care for survivors of sexual violence. The court clarified that 'treatment' encompasses first aid, diagnostic tests, surgeries, mental health counseling, and does not require an ID for emergency admission.

Right to Health and Therapeutic Access

  • The ruling aligns with the rights to health, dignity, privacy, and life, advocating for comprehensive medical support for all survivors of sexual and gender-based violence.
  • It raises questions about extending similar provisions to survivors of domestic violence and marital rape, drawing from international cases like that of Gisèle Pelicot in France.
  • Pelicot's case is used to highlight systemic biases and issues like medical gaslighting that harm women patients.

Challenges and Public Health Concerns

The court's observations reveal ongoing challenges in providing free treatment, citing a persistent lack of attention from the political class towards sexual violence as a public health issue. Victims often lack basic necessities post-assault, such as clothing to replace items taken for forensic analysis, leading to further trauma and indignity.

State Obligations and Gendered Harms

  • The state is urged to fulfill its obligation to replace clothing and personal items seized during forensic procedures.
  • Failure to do so constitutes a form of state-sanctioned violence and neglects the gendered harm suffered by rape survivors.
  • Legal frameworks and societal systems are called upon to ensure adequate support, highlighting the historical advocacy efforts by figures such as Vasudha Dhagamwar.

Conclusion

Overall, the Delhi High Court's order is a significant step towards ensuring therapeutic access and support for survivors of sexual violence, emphasizing the need for systemic changes in how survivors are treated within medical and legal systems.

Subscribe for Premium Features