India's Diplomatic Approach towards the US-Israeli War on Iran

The recent silence of the Indian government regarding the US-Israeli conflict with Iran has sparked criticism from Indian liberals, who perceive this as a moral failure. However, this article argues that India's silence is a strategic decision based on historical and current diplomatic practices.

Historical Context

• Non-Alignment Policy:
  India's foundation in non-alignment under Jawaharlal Nehru was not about avoiding moral stances but about preserving sovereignty and avoiding Cold War entanglements.
• Past Precedents:
  India has historically chosen silence when national interests were at stake, such as during Soviet actions in Hungary (1956), Czechoslovakia (1968), and Afghanistan (1979). The Soviet Union was a crucial partner for India, providing arms and diplomatic support, making overt condemnation imprudent.

Current Diplomatic Strategy

• Multi-alignment:
  In today's multipolar world, India practices "multi-alignment," engaging with various global powers to protect national interests while advocating for global justice.
• Strategic Interests:
  India's relationships with Gulf states and the US are crucial due to economic ties, energy security, and the welfare of millions of Indian expatriates. The Gulf region accounts for approximately $200 billion in annual trade and is vital for India's energy imports.

Pragmatism over Moral Absolutism

• Consequences of Condemnation:
  Condemning the US-Israeli actions could destabilize India's diplomatic relations, jeopardize remittances, energy supplies, and trade links, thereby affecting India's economic and strategic well-being.
• Balance of Principles and Pragmatism:
  India's foreign policy is centered on sovereignty, prosperity, and peace, prioritizing practical considerations over moral grandstanding.

Strategic Silence

• Diplomatic Leverage:
  Silence is a strategic choice when lacking leverage. It allows for maintaining communication channels and potential diplomatic resolutions.
• National Interest:
  The decision reflects an understanding of global dynamics and prioritizes India's strategic needs over ideological commitments.

Conclusion

India's restraint in publicly condemning the US-Israeli conflict with Iran reflects a nuanced approach to foreign policy, balancing moral principles with pragmatic national interests. This strategy underscores the importance of maintaining regional stability and economic ties while keeping diplomatic options open.