Supreme Court lays guidelines for re-arresting a person after violation of Article 22 | Current Affairs | Vision IAS

Upgrade to Premium Today

Start Now
MENU
Home
Quick Links

High-quality MCQs and Mains Answer Writing to sharpen skills and reinforce learning every day.

Watch explainer and thematic concept-building videos under initiatives like Deep Dive, Master Classes, etc., on important UPSC topics.

A short, intensive, and exam-focused programme, insights from the Economic Survey, Union Budget, and UPSC current affairs.

ESC

In Summary

  • SC bars re-arrest after illegal arrest for Article 22(1) breach; magistrate sanction mandatory.
  • Article 22 safeguards include 24-hour production before magistrate and right to legal counsel.
  • Preventive detention limited to 3 months without Advisory Board approval.

In Summary

Supreme Court (SC) barred investigating agencies from re-arresting an accused on their own after the arrest has been declared illegal for violating the Article 22(1) of the Constitution.

Key Safeguards provided for re-arrest

  • No automatic re-arrest after Article 22 breach: Magistrate’s sanction mandatory for re-arrest and grounds of arrest must first be furnished in writing to accused.
  • Article 22 applies across the spectrum: Including offences under IPC or under special enactments.
  • Magistrate can allow re-arrest: By assessing bona fide reasons and need for custody, giving decision preferably within one week by adhering to the principles of natural justice.
    • Investigating agency must explain before a magistrate why grounds were not supplied initially. 
  • Immediate superior must endorse re-arrest plea: To rule out any foul play or collusion
  • Investigation to be handed to another officer: Along with a departmental inquiry against erring officer.

About Article 22

  • It is a fundamental right that grants certain protection to persons arrested or detained in custody, such as-
    • Must be produced before a magistrate within 24 hours of arrest and cannot be detained in custody beyond it without the authority of a magistrate.
    • To be informed about the grounds of arrest.
    • Get legal representation of choice.
  • It does not apply to enemy alien or person arrested\detained under preventive detention.
    • In case of preventive detention no person can be detained for more than 3 months, unless allowed by an Advisory Board.
Watch Video News Today

Explore Related Content

Discover more articles, videos, and terms related to this topic

RELATED VIDEOS

1
Lateral Entry

Lateral Entry

YouTube HD

RELATED TERMS

3

Enemy Alien

A citizen or national of a country that is at war with India. The protections under Article 22 of the Constitution do not apply to enemy aliens, allowing for their detention under different legal frameworks.

Principles of Natural Justice

Fundamental principles of fairness in legal proceedings, typically including the right to be heard (audi alteram partem) and the rule against bias (nemo judex in causa sua). The article suggests that the proposed FCRA amendments might violate these principles by allowing asset seizure without fair process.

Advisory Board

A body constituted to review cases of preventive detention. Under Article 22, an Advisory Board's recommendation is necessary to extend the period of preventive detention beyond three months, ensuring a check on arbitrary detentions.

Title is required. Maximum 500 characters.

Search Notes

Filter Notes

Loading your notes...
Searching your notes...
Loading more notes...
You've reached the end of your notes

No notes yet

Create your first note to get started.

No notes found

Try adjusting your search criteria or clear the search.

Saving...
Saved

Please select a subject.

Referenced Articles

linked

No references added yet