Caste census report: Removal of exemption of ‘creamy layer’ concept for most backward classes termed ‘unfair’ | Current Affairs | Vision IAS

Daily News Summary

Get concise and efficient summaries of key articles from prominent newspapers. Our daily news digest ensures quick reading and easy understanding, helping you stay informed about important events and developments without spending hours going through full articles. Perfect for focused and timely updates.

News Summary

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Caste census report: Removal of exemption of ‘creamy layer’ concept for most backward classes termed ‘unfair’

2 min read

Proposed Changes in Reservation Policy for Most Backward Classes

The Karnataka State Commission for Backward Classes has recommended the removal of the creamy layer exemption for "most backward classes" in Category 1-A, which includes 46 castes/sub-castes from nomadic and semi-nomadic groups identified in 1966. This proposal has been termed "unfair" to those outside public employment.

Key Recommendations

  • Removal of creamy layer exemption for Category 1-A and 1-B.
  • Inclusion of orphan children in reservation benefits.
  • Reclassification of some castes from Category 2-A to 1-B, including Kurubas, Madiwalas, Savithas, and Kumbaras.

Arguments for the Proposal

  • Some individuals within these categories have achieved significant wealth and political influence.
  • Intense competition among castes in Category 1, with wealthier individuals potentially monopolizing reservation benefits.

Counterarguments

  • K.N. Lingappa highlights low literacy levels within these castes, hindering access to technical posts.
  • Lack of political representation for 46 nomadic and semi-nomadic castes.
  • Recommendation does not adequately consider social backwardness, a critical indicator of overall backwardness.
  • Concerns about scattered classification of similar sub-castes between Category 1-A and 1-B.

Statistical Insights

  • Literacy levels around 50% in some nomadic and semi-nomadic castes.
  • No elected MPs or MLAs from these communities since Independence.
  • Current 4% reservation deemed insufficient for 95 most backward castes in Category 1.

Constitutional Considerations

  • Need to consider provisions of Article 15 (4) and 16 (4) for classification, focusing on adequate representation in public employment.
  • Tags :
  • Reservation Policy
  • Article 15 (4) and 16 (4)
Subscribe for Premium Features