Proportional Representation | Current Affairs | Vision IAS
Monthly Magazine Logo

Table of Content

    Proportional Representation

    Posted 27 Jul 2024

    3 min read

    Why in the news?

    Recently, experts in India have called to consider Proportional Representation (PR) for Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections instead First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) electoral system.

    Difference between First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) and Proportional Representation

     

    First-Past-The-Post (Simple majority system)

    Proportional Representation

    Geographical unit

    • Country is divided into small geographical units called constituencies or districts.
    • Large geographical areas are demarcated as constituencies; the entire country may be a single constituency.

    Representation

    • Every constituency elects one representative.
    • More than one representative may be elected from one constituency

    Voting Process

    • Voter votes for a candidate.
    • Voter votes for the party 

    Seat Distribution

    • A party may get more seats than votes in the legislature.
    • The winning candidate may not secure the majority (50%+1) of votes.
    • Every party gets seats in the legislature in proportion to the percentage of votes it receives.

    Examples

    • U.S., U.K., Canada, India (Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies).
    • Israel, Netherlands.

    Benefits

    • Simple to understand for common voters.
    • Facilitates the formation of a stable government.
    • Encourages voters from different social groups to come together to win an election in a locality.
    • Ensures representation of all parties based on their vote share.
    • Fairer treatment of minority parties and independent candidates.
    • Fewer votes are wasted as more people's preferences are taken into account.

    Concerns

    • Over or under-representation of political parties compared to their vote share.
    • Does not ensure due representation for minorities (small groups).
    • Can lead to fragmented legislatures with multiple small parties.
    • May result in coalition governments which can be less stable in parliamentary democracy.
    A flowchart titled

    Reasons for not adopting PR system by Constitution

    • Difficulty for voters to understand the PR system due to its complexity.
    • Unsuitability to parliamentary government due to tendency of system to multiply political parties leading to instability in government.
    • Highly Expensive and does not give any scope for organising by-elections.
    • Eliminates intimate contacts between voters and representatives.
    • Increases the significance of party system and decreases that of voter.

    Way ahead

    • Law commission Recommendation (170th report): Introduction of MMPR system on an experimental basis.  It had suggested that 25% of seats may be filled through a PR system by increasing strength of Lok Sabha.
      • Incorporating MMPR system for incremental seats or allocating at least 25% from each State/UT could alleviate apprehensions of smaller states (like Meghalaya) about FPTP system dominance by larger States.
    • Increasing number of seats based on 2026 Delimitation Exercise: Over past five decades, uneven population growth across regions complicates allocating Lok Sabha seats solely by population, potentially undermining federal principles and causing state disenchantment.
    • Tags :
    • Elections
    • Proportional Representation
    Download Current Article
    Subscribe for Premium Features

    Quick Start

    Use our Quick Start guide to learn about everything this platform can do for you.
    Get Started